The NCAA's eligibility rules are once again under scrutiny, as quarterback Trinidad Chambliss has secured another year of college eligibility. But here's where it gets controversial... The Mississippi judge's decision to grant Chambliss a preliminary injunction against the NCAA has sparked debate. While the NCAA claims this ruling undermines their rules and threatens the future of college sports, some argue that the organization is becoming a toothless, arbitrary bureaucracy. The NCAA's plea to Congress to federalize college sports and revert to antitrust violations has so far gone nowhere. And this is the part most people miss... The NCAA's own actions have contributed to this situation, as they have been gradually exposed as a shield for schools to justify not paying players. The sooner the NCAA goes away, the better off the member universities and their student-athlete-employees will be. The NCAA is currently trying to help only itself, by finding a solution to the current college-sports chaos that doesn't result in the NCAA's extinction. So, what do you think? Do you agree with the judge's decision, or do you think the NCAA has a point? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
